EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-07/[e-mail]_Wed Jul 5 08:41:04 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-08-06 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA253678864; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 08:41:04 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from netmail2.microsoft.com by webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA253528844; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 08:40:44 -0700
Received:  by netmail2.microsoft.com (5.65/25-eef)
    id AA29233; Wed, 5 Jul 95 09:15:07 -0700
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Received: by netmail2 using fxenixd 1.0 Wed, 05 Jul 95 09:15:07 PDT
X-Msmail-Message-Id:  06637973
X-Msmail-Conversation-Id:  06637973
From: Kent Cedola <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Date: Wed,  5 Jul 95 08:40:14 TZ
Subject: RE: Windows NT 3.51?
X-Msxmtid: red-28-msg950705154348MTP[01.00.00]000000da-20255
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

| Anyone have any info comparing Windows NT 3.5 with the new 3.51 version?
| Any improvements in LW rendering times, or better memory use? Is it worth
| $89? (Seems a bit steep for a measly one one-hundreth of a whole number
| upgrade... :)

NT 3.51 is faster, smaller, contains some Win95 UI support (new
controls for example), new by file/directory NTFS compression, PPC
support and a bunch of other improvements.

-- Kent


--
Kent Cedola <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]